Congress considers the impact of Brown vs. Board of Education 65 years later: are we where we need to be?
Will the Congress buy Trump's proposal to take student aid money away and use it for a moonshot?
And what about that Higher Ed Act rewrite? Will we ever see it?
Today marks the 65th Anniversary of the Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court landmark decision that established the principle that separate is not equal. How far have we come? Much to contemplate here. You will see below that a House education panel spoke loud and clear on that topic: we have a long way to go.
This week President Trump submitted to Congress some revisions to his original budget request. Notably, he took back the proposed cut he originally made for Special Olympics (after great bipartisan outrage); but he also added a new cut in the form of an additional $1.9 billion to the Pell grant surplus. It appears that the Pell cut would go toward funding the President's proposed 2024 NASA moonshot! Education advocates were outraged. As Jon Fansmith of the American Council on Education put it: "Do I want to make college more expensive to fund space travel to the moon and Mars?" Hmmm ...
The President had already requested a $2 billion cut in Pell funding. So the total $3.9 billion recission would result in the Pell surplus being exhausted by 2022! This request is likely to be ignored on Capitol Hill, as no one -- Republican or Democrat -- ever really contemplated cutting Special Olympics. And while the Pell Surplus has been modestly raided in the past, a $3.9 billion cut is highly unlikely.
The House is on tap to finish this week having four of the twelve appropriations bills (including for education) ready to go to the floor for a vote. Another two will have moved through subcommittee, bringing the House closer to meeting its goal of having all 12 funding bills on the floor during the month of June. Meanwhile the Senate appears to be stymied until a final deal is reached on the budget caps. Recall that the House generated their own budget caps in order to move funding bills, knowing that at some point they would have to negotiate with the Senate. That time is coming soon.
The draft Committee report for the Labor/HHS/Education funding bill marked up in Committee this week includes a number of provisions related to hot topics in education.
On Thursday, the House Committee on Education and Labor, chaired by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), adopted two pieces of legislation intended to curb the growing racial segregation in K-12 schools. In opening the markup, Chair Scott noted:
"The legacy of systemic inequality and racial segregation continues to deny millions of children the opportunity to reach their full potential. Instead of confronting this injustice, the federal government has continually retreated from its role in promoting school diversity, erasing decades of progress toward educational equity. These two bills will help reverse that trend."Ranking Member Virginia Foxx (R-NC), said that while her Democrat colleagues have good intentions, the resulted legislation is shortsighted and intended to make political points. Republicans opposed both bills while Democrats supported them by a 26-20 vote.
The Labor/HHS/Education funding bill passed by the House Appropriations Committee this month includes a call for a study on teacher shortages. The Committee report calls for the study to be conducted by the Department of Education and the Department of Labor. The Committee report describes the study as follows, in part:
"The Committee is concerned by the wide-ranging teacher shortages experienced in many States and districts across the country. In particular, the Committee is concerned by national research which shows that rural districts, where salaries are lower and districts are forced to rely on provisionally licensed teachers, can be hit particularly hard by teacher shortages. Similarly, in school districts with higher minority student populations, shortages have necessitated lower standards for teacher certification and other professional qualifications ... The report should examine trends in teacher shortages and factors contributing to challenges with teacher recruitment and retention. The analysis should include, but not be limited to an examination of the following factors: personnel to support students with disabilities; geography, the characteristics of communities impacted, including student demographics, area median income, or per-pupil spending; the diversity of the educator workforce; and issues related to licensure..."This provision is an important federal acknowledgement of the severe teacher shortages in our nation. For it to be enacted, the Senate would have to adopt it also.
A spokesperson for the office of Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, reiterated that they intended to have a draft Higher Education Act reauthorization bill ready by the end of May. We know staff are working hard to meet that goal. The House appears to be watching and thinking, but no announcements yet. This is definitely one to stay tuned on. There is a lot in the bill related to teachers and teacher preparation!5. New Resources for Educators