What is the Department of Education up to while Congress focuses on impeachment?
How many special education teachers in California are not certified for their jobs?
What are the big changes in the House Democratic rewrite of the Higher Education Act?
As you know, all eyes are focused on the Senate impeachment trial this week. And with the House being in recess, there is no Congressional business underway directly related to education. This may be the case next week as well, since the trial will continue in the Senate. We will keep our eyes peeled. But meanwhile there is a lot going on over at the Department of Education.
The Department of Education is launching a new unit in the Office for Civil Rights which is intended to assist schools and universities in "proactively" complying with federal civil rights laws before complaints are filed. Dubbed the Outreach, Prevention, Education and Non-discrimination (OPEN) Center, the initiative will provide targeted support to schools, educators, families and students in relation to federal non-discrimination laws.
Kenneth Marcus, assistant Secretary of Education for civil rights, said the Center "is all about strengthening civil rights compliance through voluntary, proactive activities." Christian Corrigan - currently senior counsel in the Office for Civil Rights - will lead the Center as acting director.
House Democrats have criticized DeVos for her lax enforcement of civil rights laws, sending a letter in October, 2019 signed by 59 Representatives citing findings from a Center for American Progress Report which determined that under DeVos OCR was 9 times less likely to take corrective action on sexual orientation and gender-identity complaints than the Obama Administration.
Democrats letter: https://bonamici.house.gov/
Last year Sec. DeVos decided to rescind the Obama era regulations intended to curb abuses of for-profit colleges, the so called "gainful employment" regulation. The regulation was intended to cut off federal funds to career college programs when graduates leave with large debt relative to their earnings. DeVos argued that the rule unfairly targeted for-profit colleges and was too punitive.
The AFT lawsuit claims DeVos illegally eliminated the rule doing so in an arbitrary and capricious manner in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. AFT president, Randi Weingarten, said the DeVos decision was based on misstatements of academic research and that it sides with profiteers, not borrowers. The Department will fight the lawsuit and defend its decision to eliminate the regulation.
That's it for now. Are you watching the impeachment trial? I find it hard not to!
See you on @janewestdc